CBD oil for animals: studies, species differences and safety
CBD oil for animals is often associated with high expectations. Yet dogs, cats and horses are not interchangeable research subjects, and a product intended for humans is not automatically suitable for animals. Anyone exploring cannabidiol in animals should therefore consider research, tolerability and the specific composition separately.
What studies of CBD in dogs investigate
A randomised, blinded crossover study by Gamble and colleagues, published in 2018, investigated a particular CBD-containing oil in dogs with osteoarthritis. The authors reported improvements in certain assessed pain and activity measures. They also observed an increase in alkaline phosphatase, a laboratory parameter. Read the original study in dogs with osteoarthritis.
Such results contribute to research; they are not a general assurance of efficacy. The investigation involved a particular condition, a particular preparation and a limited period. It does not establish whether every CBD oil is safe or helpful for every dog. A change in a laboratory value should neither be concealed nor equated with specific organ damage without further investigation.
Why CBD in cats cannot simply be assessed as it is in dogs
In 2019, Deabold and colleagues investigated the absorption and preliminary safety of a CBD-rich hemp preparation in healthy dogs and cats. Measured blood concentrations and observed responses differed between species. In cats, the authors described reactions including increased licking and head-shaking during administration. Read the investigation in healthy dogs and cats.
A tolerability investigation of this kind is not an efficacy study in sick cats. Conversely, findings in dogs cannot simply be transferred to cats, horses or other species. Species, health status, concurrent medication and formulation are all relevant to an individual veterinary assessment.
CBD is not the same as hemp seed oil
When reading a product name, first establish which ingredient it refers to. ‘Hemp oil’ and ‘CBD oil’ are often used interchangeably in everyday language. A name alone, however, does not identify which cannabinoids were detected, in what amounts, or what other ingredients are present.
The complete ingredient list is more useful for assessment than a plant motif on a label. ‘Natural’ also does not replace checking suitability for a particular animal. An analytical report can describe the composition of a tested batch; it is not evidence of veterinary efficacy.
Do not use human products in animals without assessment
Whether a CBD oil is suitable for an animal cannot be inferred from its CBD concentration or from a low THC value alone. Carrier ingredients, other cannabinoids, additives and the product's intended use must also be assessed.
This article therefore does not recommend administering a Parmorcan® product to an animal. It also provides no drop counts, weight charts or administration schedules. Selecting a preparation and considering treatment are matters for a veterinary practice.
Information that can help your veterinarian
If you would like to discuss CBD, provide the following information wherever possible:
species, age, weight and known health conditions,
current medication and other supplementary products,
the exact product name and complete ingredient list,
cannabinoid information and any available batch-specific analytical report,
specific symptoms and previous investigations.
This provides a clear starting point for discussion instead of a general advertising promise. For acute symptoms or an adverse reaction, seek veterinary advice promptly and keep the packaging available.
What regulatory guidance does and does not say
In its questions about cannabis and CBD, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that it has not approved cannabis products for animals and cannot assure their safety. This statement concerns the US regulatory context. It is not a blanket account of the legal status of every product in Germany or the EU.
For the basic terminology, read What is CBD?. This article provides general information only and does not replace veterinary examination or treatment.
Sources and further evidence
The following sources are already linked in the text. The short English descriptions are provided for orientation; the original titles and bibliographic details are available in the linked publications.
Comments